Blog Home  Home Feed your aggregator (RSS 2.0)  
Accentient - Saturday, February 05, 2005
Visual Studio ALM Experts
 
# Wednesday, January 26, 2005
Click "Read more" for the full chat!
Wednesday, January 26, 2005 7:36:53 PM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [33]   Team System  | 
Click "See more" to see the entire Expert Answers part of the chat...
Wednesday, January 26, 2005 7:33:24 PM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [0]   Team System  | 
# Saturday, January 22, 2005

Martin Danner (web site) of Arrowrock has agreed to assist us in developing Microsoft Official Curriculum (MOC) for Visual Studio Team System (VSTS).  He's an expert in process methodologies, UML and project management -- all critical experiences for us right now!  Plus he's a smart developer with solid business experience, and an overall great guy. 

Looks like he'll also be writing some VSTS Whitepapers for MSDN, and also becoming a general VSTS expert.  Welcome aboard, Martin!

Saturday, January 22, 2005 5:38:12 PM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [3]   Misc | Team System  | 

Rich Hundhausen (blog) showed me a great site today.  It's http://bink.nu/CodeNames.bink.  It's got all (or nearly all) of the MS codenames for their various products.  Fun site to browse.

Saturday, January 22, 2005 5:11:54 PM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [1]   Misc  | 
# Tuesday, January 18, 2005
Long Tail Blog by kristen

I noted the concept of the “Long Tail” in a recent post.  Looks like the author of the piece in Wired has an extensive blog that covers many, many instances.  It can be found at http://longtail.typepad.com/.  Check it out!  It's a great read!

Tuesday, January 18, 2005 11:48:26 PM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [0]   Personal Thoughts  | 
# Saturday, January 15, 2005
The Long Tail by kristen

Total sales of unpopular items often exceed total sales of popular items.  Consider some stats from a recent article in Wired magazine. 

The average Barnes & Noble carries 130,000 titles. Yet more than half of Amazon's book sales come from outside its top 130,000 titles. Consider the implication: If the Amazon statistics are any guide, the market for books that are not even sold in the average bookstore is larger than the market for those that are... Venture capitalist and former music industry consultant Kevin Laws puts it this way: "The biggest money is in the smallest sales."

Next think music sales.  A record store carries only the most popular items.  The ones they can sell.  But how much of a market is there for minor tracks?  Consider Rhapsody, an online music streaming service (which I subscribe to, and enjoy):

Not only is every one of Rhapsody's top 100,000 tracks streamed at least once each month, the same is true for its top 200,000, top 300,000, and top 400,000.

For those of us thinking about how to make money online, there are some important consequences.  Try to think of all the really successful online businesses.  Which ones exploit the 'long tail'?  Ebay?  Clearly!  Nearly everything there is a 'one off'.  Amazon.com?  Yep, see above.  Google.  I'd guess yes; that most of their ad revenue comes from very targeted ads related to searches.  Netflix?  Again, there are thousands of movies in the 'long tail'.  I'm a Netflix subscriber.  Mostly because it's the only place in the US I can get reliable access to German language DVDs.  Any others?  Can you think of a very successful online business that doesn't rely on the long tail? 

Saturday, January 15, 2005 4:23:35 PM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [0]   Personal Thoughts  | 
# Friday, January 14, 2005
Innumeracy by kristen

<mathGeek> The Associated Press (AP) quotes (evidently without analysis) numbers from National Coalition of the Homeless.  They claim that there are 3.5 million homeless in the US.  Now, I don't know how many there are, and it has little to do with innumeracy.  But they then claim that their are 3,000 deaths of homeless people every year.  The focus of the article was on the tragedy of homeless deaths.  To me, even one homeless person having to die alone, and on the street is too many.  But here's where the math comes in...  3,000 deaths from 3.5 million homeless gives a death rate of 0.0857%.  That seemed suspiciously low.  A quick check of the CIA World Fact Book states that the death rate for the entire US is 8.34 deaths per thousand, or a rate of 0.834%.  So, if the numbers are correct, you are 10 times LESS likely to die if you are homeless. 

This seems highly unlikely to me, as homelessness seems, on first blush, to be less healthy than having a place to live.  However, it may be that homeless people tend to be young and healthy.  Or it could be that the at least one of the numbers given by the National Coalition of the Homeless is incorrect.  I'm guessing that the number of deaths is fairly well documented, while the number of homeless must be determined statistically.  If that's the case, a more likely number of homeless in the US would be around 350,000, assuming a mortality rate approximately equal to the rest of the population.  Once again, there may be many factors that influence the actual number, but a very quick 'reality-check' on the numbers reveals the possibility of very serious numerical errors.  (It looks like the NCH is overstating the number of homeless by 3.15 million.)  Homelessness is a very real problem, but drastically inflating the size of the problem for attention does nobody any favors.  Once people BS-meters are triggered, then it's hard to take anything else said seriously, thus damaging your cause. (Hat Tip: Wall Street Journal Online)</mathGeek>

Friday, January 14, 2005 8:00:07 PM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [0]   Personal Thoughts  | 

Well, we did it!  After much hand wringing and deep conversations, we decided to hire our first 1099 employee.  Gary Gumbiner has agreed to work for the next few months on a project for Microsoft and Lionbridge.  He'll be working on designing (and possible developing) a course in IIS6 for general system administrators.  We're not making squat monetarily on the deal, however, it is allowing us more depth and capacity as a company.  That's something we're very concerned with since we've been having to turn down a great deal of work lately. 

Gary is a great guy, with experience as a Subject Matter Expert (SME) on earlier MS courses.  He's also worked with 3Leaf, another great company based in Portland, Oregon.  We're happy to have him on board!

Friday, January 14, 2005 11:21:51 AM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [0]   Misc  | 

I posted earlier that I had installed X1, the fantastic (if expensive) desktop search on an earlier OS install, and that I loved it.  Well, Yahoo! has licensed it, and it's available for free download at http://desktop.yahoo.com/.  I installed the free version, and LOVE it!  Like X1, it handily beats Lookout and Google Desktop.  I highly recommend it!  By the way, if you ever search emails using the internal Outlook search, or search for files on your hard drive, you NEED a tool!  And this one is the best I've found.  A great review of Yahoo! Desktop Search can be found here.

Friday, January 14, 2005 11:04:29 AM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [3]   Misc | Software Tools  | 

Whoops!  I've got a Gmail account!  Interesting problem.  Google was inadvertantly placing random emails into the “Reply To” field of emails.  That's right.  Whole emails were accidentally being dropped into the “Reply To” field of someone else's email.  The good folks at Google have it fixed now.  You can read all about it at BetaNews.

Friday, January 14, 2005 10:08:11 AM (Mountain Standard Time, UTC-07:00)  #    Comments [0]   Misc  | 
Copyright © 2010 Richard Hundhausen. All rights reserved.
DasBlog 'Portal' theme by Johnny Hughes.
Pick a theme: